Publication Ethics

LEMLIT (Research Institute) STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including writers, editorial leaders, editorial boards, peer-reviewers and publishers.

Ethical Guidelines for Publication Journals

Publication of articles in Visipena's peer-reviewed journal is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and institutions that support them. Article-peer reviews support and embody the scientific method. It is important to agree on standards that are expected to be ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public.

LEMLIT (Research Institute) STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh as the publisher of the Visipena journal takes on its guardianship duties for all stages of publishing very seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertisements, reprints or other commercial income do not have an impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, LEMLIT (Research Institute) STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena Banda Aceh and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and / or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decision

The editor of the Visipena journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal must be published. Validating the work and its importance for researchers and readers must always encourage the decision. The editors can be guided by the journal editorial policy and limited by legal provisions, such as will occur in the case of defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can speak with other editors or review these decisions.

Fair play

The editor at any time evaluates the script for their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about the manuscript submitted to someone other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial appropriate advisers and the appropriate publisher.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Unpublished material disclosed in a text submitted must not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Reviewers' assignments

Contributions to Editorial Decisions

Peer reviews help editors to make editorial decisions and through editorial communication with the author can also help authors improve paper.

Speed

Every selected referee who feels qualified to review the research reported in the manuscript or knows that a quick review that would be impossible must notify the editor and ask for the review process.

Confidentiality

Every text received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.

Objectivity Standards

The review must be carried out objectively. Inappropriate author's personal criticism. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source Recognition

Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been quoted by the author. Each statement that observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer must also call the editor's attention there is substantial or overlapping similarity between the script being considered and any other published papers for which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must not consider manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with one of the authors, companies, or institutions that are connected to the paper.

Author's Task

Reporting

The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the work carried out and discuss the purpose of the meaning. Underlying data must be accurately represented in the newspaper. Paper A must contain enough detail and references to allow others to copy the work. Fraud or intentionally inaccurate reports are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention

The author is asked to provide raw data related to paper for editorials, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data, if possible, and must in any case be prepared to store the data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors must ensure that they have written the whole original work, and if the author has used the work and / or other words that this has been appropriately quoted or quoted.

Multiple, redundant or simultaneous publications

An author should not generally publish a script describing the same basic research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript for more than one concurrent journal is unethical publishing behavior and is not acceptable.

Source Recognition

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author must cite publications that have influence in determining the nature of the work reported.

Paperwork

Essays must be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported research. All people who have made significant contributions must be registered as co-authors. Where other people have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The appropriate authors must ensure that all co-authors are appropriate and that no inappropriate co-authors are included on paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to the submission for publication.

Dangers and Human or Animal Subjects

If work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author clearly must identify this in the text.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their texts any substantive financial conflicts or interests that might be interpreted to influence the results or interpretations of their texts. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his / her own work is published, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to withdraw or correct the paper.